You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve the quality of people’s lives so that government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
REPORTED ON 11 AUGUST 2022
FOR VIDEO EXPLANATION: https://youtu.be/-70re4jEQmo
It is argued that governments should spend money on more relevant sectors rather than on arts such as music and painting to improve the quality of life of their citizens. I think the view has a greater relevance in this competitive world, which is more leaning towards science and technology.
The cardinal reason why I support the view is because the arts sector is losing its significance when compared to the past. To be precise, musicians and painters were given dignity and most of them hardly faced any financial crisis all through their life even a couple of centuries ago. However, with the technological revolution, in the post-industrialized era, these fields started losing its grip and eventually, many artists started facing financial crises.
On the other hand, the importance of science and technology in the daily life of people has increased steadily, and those who took up their career from these areas prospered both socially and economically. To be clearer, the advancements in science and technology opened tremendous opportunities to the people, while the scope of music and painting remained the same. For instance, the fields of engineering and medicine uplifted the quality of life of many. Therefore, it is justifiable for governments to focus its financial attention towards such prospering fields.
I admit that there are a significant proportion of people who are still enjoying superior standards of living in the field of arts. For example, there are celebrities from music who earn hundred times more than an eminent scientist or an architect. However, this applies to a minority of the current global population.
To conclude, it is clear that arts such as music and painting are less likely to offer a better quality of life, and hence it becomes logical for the government to spend money in areas of better scope like science and technology.