It is argued that it is better to train drivers properly than awarding them with heftier punishments in order to bring down the incidents of driving offences. I feel both should co-exist, and the reasons for the same are discussed in the following paragraphs.

When viewed in the first way, if an effective driving education is given before a person is issued with a driving license, it can enhance his knowledge regarding the safe driving habits on roads. This should be upgraded periodically, for example in every two years. This would make them aware of the traffic reforms and newer techniques which are adopted in driving. Drivers would become confident enough and would become experts with this periodic training. Ultimately, the number of cases registered against those who offend on roads would decline tremendously.

Turning to the second option, when the offenders behind the wheels are approached with stringent punitive measures, many undesired incidents on roads are seen prevented. It is a fact that many traffic violators and rash drivers exist just because the legislations to curb their actions are lax. If they are addressed with punishments like suspending or cancelling their license, such incidents can be brought down. In some countries, some offenders are sentenced to jail for their wrongdoings, and this definitely seems to deter driving offences.

To conclude, it is clear that both better drivers’ education and heavy punishments can cut down the occurrences of driving offences. Both act in separate ways, and hence both should co-exist.

Word count: 250