You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people believe that advances in technology designed to reduce crimes, such as closed circuit television systems, invade the personal privacy of innocent people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is opined that security systems to curb crimes such as surveillance cameras are interfering with the privacy of the common people, who do not have any intention to commit crimes. I agree to the view to a greater extent.
The prime reason behind my agreement is because of the overuse of these gadgets in public places such as bus stations, rail stations and cinemas. To be precise, devices such as closed circuit television systems are intended to monitor the places and situations which are at high risk for crimes. However, these monitoring systems are installed almost everywhere, and this definitely makes a man uncomfortable.
Another reason why I support the opinion is because of the lack of confidentiality of the data. To be clearer, there are no stringent laws regarding the storage and usage of the pictures and videos recorded on these devices and this gives ample opportunity for the leakage of those visuals. To explain it further, this information can be manipulated by wrong hands and lead to many cyber-crimes including cyber bullying and blackmailing.
I admit the introduction of these devices have brought down the crime rate substantially and is much needed in sensitive areas to monitor any probable signs of crime. However, I feel circumstances which hinder personal privacy should not be encouraged.
To conclude, though technological advanced devices such as closed circuit cameras help to curtail crimes significantly, it is a fact that it hinders the privacy concerns of innocent public.